Numbered hierarchy
Organize scope, functional requirements, non-functional requirements and acceptance criteria consistently.
Draft requirements in a format that is easy for humans and AI tools to produce, then apply a structured SRS standard for review, approval and delivery.
An SRS is more than a long list of features. It needs a stable hierarchy, requirement identifiers, priorities, acceptance criteria and a document format that reviewers can navigate. Unmarkdown provides an SRS-focused sample and professional styling while keeping Markdown as the editable source.
Use stable requirement IDs and explicit verification methods so reviewers can trace each requirement from intent to acceptance test.
Open this sample in the studio →# Software Requirements Specification
## 1. Purpose
Define the requirements for the document conversion workflow.
## 2. Functional Requirements
| ID | Requirement | Priority | Verification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FR-001 | The system shall preview Markdown before export. | Must | Test |
| FR-002 | The system shall export editable DOCX files. | Must | Test |
## 3. Acceptance Criteria
Each requirement passes its documented verification method.Paste this prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or another AI assistant with your project context. It requests clean Markdown that is ready for review and professional export.
No sign-up. Use with any AI assistant.Using only the source material and requirements I provide, create the complete document as raw GitHub-Flavored Markdown (.md). Do not generate, attach, or encode a DOCX/PDF; use the response budget for accurate, useful content. OUTPUT CONTRACT - Return only the finished Markdown document: no preamble, commentary, or code fence around the whole response. - Use exactly one `#` H1 for the document title, then sequential `##` and `###` headings without skipping levels. - Keep paragraphs concise, sections complete, terminology consistent, and the hierarchy easy to scan. - Never invent facts, metrics, quotations, requirements, URLs, or citations. Mark missing inputs as `[TBD: specific information needed]`. - Do not add HTML, manual page numbers, a manually typed table of contents, base64 data, or decorative filler. Unmarkdown generates pagination and the table of contents from the heading structure. MARKDOWN TOOLKIT — use each feature only when it improves the document - `**bold**` for labels or key terms, `_italic_` for light emphasis, and `~~strikethrough~~` only for explicit revisions. - Unordered `-` lists, ordered `1.` steps, and `- [ ]` task lists for actions or review checklists. - `> blockquotes` for warnings, decisions, constraints, or important callouts. - GFM tables with a header and separator row; keep every row the same width and keep cells concise. - Fenced code blocks with a language tag such as `json`, `yaml`, `bash`, `typescript`, or `sql`; never use a fence around the whole document. - Mermaid diagrams in a fenced `mermaid` block when a flow, sequence, architecture, state, or dependency diagram adds real value. - Descriptive links as `[label](https://example.com)` and `---` rules only between major document parts. - Prepare a separate alphabetical Index page by marking important terms at their first relevant mention with `[[index: Term]]`. Use `[[index: Primary term: Subentry]]` for a nested entry. Do not type an Index heading, page numbers, or the index list yourself; Unmarkdown generates the final Index page and page references during Word export. - Escape Markdown control characters when they are meant to appear literally. DOCUMENT STANDARD Build a review-ready Software Requirements Specification with traceable, testable requirements. - Include metadata, purpose, scope, stakeholders, system overview, assumptions, constraints, actors, interfaces, data, functional requirements, non-functional requirements, security, and acceptance criteria. - Use tables for requirements: `ID | Requirement | Rationale | Priority | Verification`, with unique `FR-001` and `NFR-001` identifiers and unambiguous 'shall' statements. - Add a Mermaid context or workflow diagram when useful, plus a traceability table linking requirements to acceptance tests. - Flag unresolved requirements as `[TBD: decision/input]`; do not fabricate performance targets. FINAL QUALITY CHECK - Verify heading order, table column counts, list indentation, code-fence pairing, requirement/decision IDs, and internal consistency. - Remove empty sections and generic filler. Preserve `[TBD: ...]` markers instead of guessing. - End with the final document content, ready to save directly as a `.md` file and convert in unmarkdown.in.
Organize scope, functional requirements, non-functional requirements and acceptance criteria consistently.
Present requirement IDs, descriptions, priorities and status in readable tables.
Export an editable review document or a stable distribution copy from the same source.
Use the included structure or upload an existing requirements document in Markdown.
Add scope, actors, interfaces, requirements, constraints and acceptance criteria.
Confirm the SRS standard, company details and page setup, then export DOCX or PDF.
Common sections include purpose, scope, system overview, interfaces, functional requirements, non-functional requirements, constraints and acceptance criteria.
Yes. Markdown tables work well for requirement IDs, descriptions, priorities, owners and verification status.
Yes. Ask the assistant for a complete SRS in Markdown, review the content, then format and export it with Unmarkdown.
Yes. The DOCX export uses editable native Word elements.